Tribalism in politics, religion, and baseball

It feels like our society is more divided than at any other point in my recollection. As November 5 approaches, I am filled with uncertainty, not about whom to vote for, but about how our country will survive the possible consequences of this election. I'm not going to tell you how I think you should vote. If you know me, that should be obvious. If you don't, then please comment below or get in touch with me via Facebook and we can have a long discussion about it. The object of this post is not to promote a particular candidate or party, but to examine the phenomenon of what I'll call "tribalism" in our society, especially as it is expressed in politics, religion, and baseball.

Let me start with perhaps the least controversial of the three: baseball. As many of you know, I am a lifelong, diehard fan of the New York Mets, who recently ended their amazing season and postseason at the hands of the Los Angeles Dodgers. Being of the philosophical bent that I am, I have pondered over the years why I am a Mets' fan and what exactly does that mean. My usual explanation is that I have always been a Mets' fan, my family of upbringing were Mets' fans and my parents were Brooklyn Dodgers' fans who embraced the new National League team, which appeared on the scene a few years after the Dodgers left. I was too young to understand this at the time, but according to my parents, there was no way that they were going to start rooting for the Yankees. To give my parents the ethical benefit of the doubt, I think I can attribute at least part of their fervor for the Brooklyn Dodgers to Branch Rickey and his signing of Jackie Robinson in 1945 to facilitate the end of the color barrier in Major League Baseball.

Now some fifty-five years after the Miracle Mets amazed the world with a World Championship in 1969 (which I vaguely remember) and fifty-one years after the Mets lost in the 1973 World Series to the Oakland A's (which I painfully remember), I cannot claim any moral high ground in my decision to remain a steadfast fan. Is it because the colors of royal blue and orange form the most beautiful palette from among the thirty MLB team designs? Is it because I am fond of certain players -- players who may change from one season to the next and may even be playing for the Yankees or Dodgers next year? Is it because I have always lived in New York? Then why don't I feel the same way about the Yankees? (I don't.) Is it because Mr. and Mrs. Met are the coolest mascots in all of sportsdom? I don't think it's any of those reasons. I think it's probably just tribalism.

So if I'm a Mets' fan because I've always been a Mets' fan, and my family of upbringing were Mets' fans, does the same apply to my choices of political party affiliation and religion? Yes and no. While it is correct that my political party and religion align closely with that of my late parents, I investigated other religions, before finally settling on the same one that my parents promoted to my brother and me when we were kids. Am I open to changing my religion? Probably. If a deity revealed himself or herself to me I am likely to accept that revelation, once I've scrutinized the evidence and convinced myself that it is not mere fancy or mental illness at work. Do I think it's a coincidence that most people adhere to the religion of their parents, just as I have? No, certainly not. I believe that tribalism is the primary reason that most folks end up either Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Zoroastrian, etcetera, etcetera... Of course there are many converts; I know some personally. I've written multiple blogposts about my own religious views and background so I don't think it's necessary to elaborate here. If you're curious, you can message me and we can discuss it further. 

My parents, especially my father, certainly influenced my political outlook, but I'd like to think that I make my decisions on whom to vote for after much research, introspection, and soul-searching. As we face a presidential election of great consequence, I've given much thought to both candidates, and continue to be amazed that the race is as close as it is. How a thinking, feeling person can stomach the other candidate is beyond my comprehension, but I believe that tribalism, prejudice and a lack of critical reasoning are contributing factors in why many people, including some whom I know and love, will be voting for the other person. I will cast my vote on November 5 and encourage you to do the same, and please, try to think a little "outside the tribe" at this critical time in our democracy. 

Why not Liberty?

 

If you're a regular follower of this blog, or a Facebook friend, you know that I am a diehard fan of the New York Mets, who recently suffered defeat at the hands of the Los Angeles Dodgers in the National League Championship Series. 

But just as I was grieving the Mets' loss, another New York City team was winning a championship, and I didn't even realize it until the next morning. The New York Liberty won the WNBA Final against the Minnesota Lynx in overtime at Barclays Center in Brooklyn on the same night that the Dodgers ended the Mets' amazing run in L.A. 

I was aware that the Liberty were playing in the Final in Brooklyn at the same time as the Mets were trying to survive another day in the MLB playoffs. But I'm not much of a basketball fan, having attended only one professional game in my life. It was a Knicks' game at Madison Square Garden over thirty year ago. I went with a group of friends and don't remember much about the game, not even who the Knicks played or who won. The only thing that I remember about the experience was how high up our seats were. I did enjoy watching basketball games in high school and college (both of my schools' teams played in the gymnasium, not an arena, and were not in one of the highly competitive intermural leagues). 

If the Knicks or Nets make it to the NBA Final I would probably watch the games, just as I would watch the Giants or Jets if either made it to the Super Bowl. I cheered for the Cleveland Cavaliers when they won the NBA championship in 2016 because my relatives in Ohio are avid fans. It was the first time in several decades that a major league team in any sport in Cleveland had won a championship. (I also root for the Cleveland Guardians on behalf of my Ohio kin, as long as they're not playing the Mets!)

Besides baseball, my favorite sport to watch is football (or soccer, as you Americans call it). I prefer international matches (like the World Cup or UEFA European Championship) but will occasionally watch an MLS match, especially if a New York team is playing.  

The New York Liberty will get their ticker-tape parade up the "Canyon of Heroes" on October 24, and I will not be there. For one thing, I hate crowds, and for another, I can't really claim to be a fan of the team. I don't think I've ever watched a game and would feel like a bit of a fraud, only jumping on the band wagon after they've won a championship. Yes, I would root for them because they are a New York team, but I haven't suffered the agonies of defeat with them in prior seasons, as I have with my beloved, though often underperforming Mets.

Besides tennis and golf, women's professional sports generally don't get the attention or revenues that men's sports do. As a feminist, I should be more supportive of the WNBA, as well as the National Women's Soccer League and the recently launched Association of Fastpitch Professionals (a women's softball league with a New York team). There is fame and fortune in women's gymnastics and figure skating, and many female Olympic athletes do get the renown (if not the money) that they deserve. The U.S. women's national soccer team has had far more success internationally than the men's team, and they've succeeded in settling a lawsuit with the U.S. Soccer Federation for equal pay with their male counterparts.

So congratulations to the New York Liberty on their championship. I'll probably be paying you a little more attention in the future.

Be happy with what you've got: living with disabilities and other inconveniences

 

Sometimes the most trite, well-worn platitudes really do ring true. I recently returned from a two week trip to beautiful Turkiye. It was supposed to be 18 days, but then I got sick and ended up in the emergency room. An overnight stay in a foreign hospital, where few doctors or nurses speak English, is not the ideal side-trip for a vacation. I left (against medical advice) and got on a JFK-bound plane the next day. I missed a couple of cities that I had planned (and paid) to visit, not to mention missing a traditional Turkish bath, seeing a Whirling Dervish ritual and getting a ride in a hot air balloon in Cappadocia.  Sigh.

I absolutely loved Turkiye, and if we happen to be friends on Facebook I encourage you to check out the hundreds of photos I posted. I plan to return, hopefully in a year or two, to pick up where I left off. This trip was a group tour, but I'm trying to stir up interest among friends and family to join me on a trip where we see what we want and go at our own pace. A possible itinerary I'm contemplating is flying to Athens (I've never been to Greece), then visiting a couple of Greek islands (like Rhodes or Lesbos), then taking a ferry to Turkiye, maybe to Fethiye or Antalya (where I left off this time) and then on to Cappadocia, Konya and Gobekli Tepe. We can then fly to Istanbul for a few days before returning to the USA. 

So what does this have to do with "living with disabilities"? I think I am in pretty good health for my age, and generally able to withstand hours of sightseeing in rugged terrains or crowded cities. I am not blind or deaf and I have all of my limbs. "Disabilities" may be too strong a word, but I do have to live with IBS, lactose intolerance, and chronic hip bursitis. (I've had IBS for decades and bursitis for years, but the lactose intolerance only reared its ugly head about a year ago after a fateful and very unpleasant tussle with an ice cream cone. I'd never had a problem with dairy before, and was told by my doctor that lactose intolerance sometimes comes with age.)

It was a bit of a bummer missing out on Turkish ice cream, yogurt and cheese, but the tour group always had a substitute for me. (I was apparently the only "problem child" among us.) I learned to love baklava almost as much as ice cream, and kept reminding myself that excellent oat milk-based frozen treats awaited me at home. (I've already indulged in a vegan cone from Van Leeuwen, which has two stores in my neighborhood.) The delicate and crispy herb-infused appetizers I was given at lunch were probably as good as the feta-cheese-filled ones my fellow travelers were served. I've learned to cope, and to adjust to life as a semi-vegan (well, not really -- I still eat meat of all kinds, eggs and butter, not to mention all forms of carbohydrates.)

I began to feel ill a few days before I ended up in the hospital, and the first group excursion I missed was a yacht ride in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Fethiye. I felt it best to rest in my hotel room while my fellow travelers sailed, swam and snorkeled the Turquoise Coast. After resting a while I felt well enough for a walk around the piers and into downtown, where I indulged in a little "retail therapy." (This was probably the most expensive stomachache of my life.) 

The emergency room visit came in the next city, Antalya. After being sick but struggling along for four days, I asked our tour director if he could connect me with a doctor who spoke English. I didn't think I was dying but I'd never been sick for so many days straight, and the Imodium and Pepto Bismol I'd brought along were just not doing it. He suggested I speak to guest services at the hotel, who produced an English-speaking nurse within 15 minutes. It was a Sunday, so no doctors were available. But I followed the nurse's advice and accepted a cab ride to the private hospital which was practically across the street from the hotel. After another 15 minutes I saw a nurse, had blood drawn and was admitted. As far as hospitals go, it was very nice and the nurses extremely attentive. I saw a doctor the next morning, who wanted me to stay a few more days for more tests, but at that point I just wanted to go home. 

My hospital breakfast -- I must have forgotten to tell them I'm lactose intolerant, but I ate the olives, egg, roll, butter and cup of tea.

The view from my private hospital room was lovely (you can see the Taurus mountains and a bit of the Mediterranean) but it still pales in comparison to the awesome view from my hotel room (see first photo above). I paid the bill (about $1300 USD for an overnight stay, lab tests and an IV for pain and hydration) and was able to fly home the next day. I saw my own doctor two days later, and she said I likely had some kind of stomach bug, but since I was feeling much better and the Turkish meds were doing the trick, she wasn't particularly concerned. 

So I learned to make the most of a wonderful and yet at times unpleasant situation. And to quote another trite truism, "there's no place like home," especially with my cuddly cat, Dexter.

OH MY GOD... the agony and ecstacy of baseball

Oh My God -- the roller-coaster of emotions, the mental, physical, psychic and spiritual ups and downs of being a sports fan. (Fellow Mets' fans, you know exactly what I mean!) 

As a life-long Mets' fan, I understand the hopes, the joys, the anguish, and the disappointments of loving a team that will more often break your heart than make it into the post-season. (As I've said to console fellow Mets' fans many a season, if all we cared about was winning then we'd be Yankees' fans.) 

Last night was the last home game of the Mets' 2024 season and I watched it on ESPN along with millions of other people -- both Mets' fans and normal folk alike. I had attended the prior day's game at Citi Field as part of the sellout crowd. They were in the midst of a four-game series against the division-leading and decades-long rivals, the Philadelphia Phillies. I don't hate the Phillies; after all, they're not the Mets' ultimate nemesis and archfiend Atlanta Braves! (Plus my one-time favorite Met, the late Tug McGraw, was traded to the Phillies way back when I was a young lass. My heart was broken for a time, yes, but eventually I got used to seeing him wearing red instead of the familiar blue and orange, so I have a soft spot for the Phils, just like I do for the Cleveland Indians -- I mean Guardians -- because my relatives in Ohio love them so much.)

Back in May, a month when our record was nine and nineteen, few Mets' fans would have dreamed we'd now be among the three wild-card leaders, with a good chance of making it to the first round of the playoffs. (If the season ended today, we'd be tied with the Diamondbacks for the last wild-card spot, and two games ahead of the displaced Braves.) The Mets even have a theoretical chance of overtaking the Phillies for the division title. The Phils have clinched a playoff spot, though because the Mets beat them last night, they haven't clinched the division just yet. (Thank the baseball gods that the boys from Philadelphia didn't get to celebrate that milestone at the last home game of the regular season on our turf!) I have no doubt the Phillies will clinch the NL East title -- their magic number is one -- and they deserve it since they really are a great team. 

Attending the next-to-last home game of the season on Saturday at Citi Field was AMAZING! The Phillies took an early lead but the Mets came back in the bottom of the second inning to tie and go ahead by a run. The Phils re-tied it in the fifth, and it stayed that way until the Mets scored three times in the bottom of the seventh. Even that comfortable lead was cut by a run when the Phils scored in the top of the eighth. But Edgar Diaz held them at bay, and with the Mets matching that run in the bottom of the inning, we finished with a six to three victory, and Edgar got a well-deserved save. (Did you hear those trumpets playing, Mets' fans?)

Buckle your seat belts, Mets' fans, because we have a crucial three-game series against the Braves starting on Tuesday, and then we end the season in Milwaukee with three against Brewers, who have already clinched the Central Division title. So six more games -- six more chances for the Mets to either cement a play-off spot, or break their fans' hearts.

But I won't be here to watch ANY OF THAT. Tomorrow, just as the Braves are taking the field in Atlanta against our boys, I'll be getting on a plane for my ten hour flight to Turkey! (Unless, of course, my flight gets delayed and I'm stuck at JFK for a few hours or more. If that happens, I'm sure every bar and restaurant at the airport will have the game on TV -- we're in QUEENS, for goodness' sakes.) I don't return home until the middle of October, at which point the League Championship Series will just be getting underway -- I can only pray that the Mets will still be in it then!

I arrive in Istanbul at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday morning (3 a.m. New York time), so once I get to my hotel and take my phone off "airplane mode" I can check the box score from Tuesday's opener against the Braves. Then I will be sightseeing and focusing on the beautiful country I am visiting for the next two and a half weeks, and not thinking about baseball at all (yeah, right...). The chances of finding a TV in Turkey with Mets' games are infinitesimally small. There's an outside chance that when the first round of MLB playoffs begins on October 1, they will be shown on some TV in some bar, somewhere in a large Turkish city. I will be in Kusadasi on the turquoise coast of the Aegean that day, hopefully not thinking about baseball. 

Neighborly connections

 

Am I a good neighbor? I'd like to think that I am. When I hear the word "neighbor," I often think of the last line of Robert Frost's poem "Mending Wall": Good fences make good neighbors. Living in an apartment building I don't have an actual fence, of course, but there certainly are metaphorical ones. Like many New Yorkers, I generally don't engage in more than a "Good morning" when I meet a neighbor in the elevator or lobby of my building.

I consider myself an introvert. I like other people, in fact I love some of them, but I also enjoy my own company. I remember reading a long time ago that one of the differences between extroverts and introverts is that extroverts draw energy from others, while for introverts like me, too much human interaction sucks the energy right out of us. If I'm at a social gathering and it's too "peopley" I may soon yearn to return home, cuddle with my cat and take a nap. 

I'm not a complete loner and do enjoy the company of people I know, especially in smaller groups. For some strange reason, I've been interacting more with my neighbors of late, and not just those who live in my building, but the neighbors I encounter on my daily strolls, including the hungry, the homeless and the immigrant. 

I need only walk a few blocks from my home on the Upper West Side of Manhattan to encounter someone sitting on the sidewalk begging. I rarely give these people money but if I have food on me I may offer them some, or if I'm in a particularly gregarious mood, I may offer to buy them a meal. A couple of weeks ago, I encountered a young man with a cardboard sign that said (in English) "help me get food for my son" or something like that. A child of about 8 or 9 years old was with him. My first reaction was irritation -- that he was using the child as a prop -- but something about either the man or the boy melted away the negative feeling and I decided to offer my help. I asked what he would like to eat but quickly realized that he spoke only Spanish. I've studied French, Italian and German, but never Spanish, though I've learned a few words from volunteering at a local food bank. Through a combination of my broken Spanish, a little Italian and some sign language, I was able to convey that I would get him sandwiches with "huevo, queso y jamon" and some orange juice. I walked a couple of blocks to a diner to get the sandwiches, then stopped at the grocery store and bought a large container of OJ. When I returned with the food and juice both he and the boy said "thank you" in English. I then inquired in my Italo-Spanglish where he was from (Venezuela) and how long he had been here (3 months). I walked away with the joyous feeling of having done a good deed, and it honestly made my day. 

A few days later, I made both myself and a senior gentleman (perhaps homeless, perhaps just hungry) happy when I bought him the slice of pizza and Sprite he had requested. This man spoke perfect English so that wasn't an issue. I asked his name and told him mine, then walked back home with a smile on my face.

Several days after that, I had a less satisfying encounter with a stranger who seemed to be in need of help. It was the middle of the afternoon and I was on my way to the post office in my neighborhood, when I was stopped by a young man who appeared in some distress. He didn't look homeless (his clothes were clean) and he didn't smell bad or seem crazy. I decided to stop for a moment and listen to him. He said he had been jumped and robbed of his wallet and train ticket and just wanted to get back home to Westchester, after having spent a night on a park bench. He said he filed a police report but they didn't help him or give him money to get home. (I don't know whether that's something police usually do.) Anyway, giving him the benefit of the doubt, and trying to retain my faith in humanity, I pulled out my wallet and handed him all the change I had, along with a $5 bill. He saw that I had a twenty and asked for it, but I said I couldn't give him that. He then got irate, insisting that I could afford to give him the twenty, and started cursing at me. I was still stunned as he walked away (with the $5 and change). All I could think to respond was, "very nice language!" as the man and his f-bombs faded into the distance. I felt foolish and angry that I had been suckered so easily, but resolved not to let this incident sour my view of humanity, or my impulse to help. Next time, I may not be so willing to give a helpless fellow human any cash, but I will continue to offer food and kindness on occasion to my neighbors on the Upper West Side, or farther afield, be they homeless, migrants, addicts, or even the occasional scammer. Bad people need to eat, too.

Why are my friends and family so weird?

I love my friends and family, honestly I do. But almost every single one of them irritates (or sometimes infuriates) me. Obviously, no one is perfect, not even me, but recently, I've become more aware of the flaws and foibles of those I love.

Maybe it's me -- maybe I'm becoming less tolerant and more crotchety. Or maybe it's the increasingly polarized and hostile environment we live in, especially as November 5 approaches. Or maybe they're all just weird. 

Now as you're reading this, don't try to figure out whether you (my beloved friend or family member) are one of those people to whom I am referring. Are you the one with whom I cannot discuss politics or religion? Are you the one who seems to "know it all" and loves the sound of his or her own voice? Are you and I constantly disagreeing on the most trivial of subjects? Do our conversations, messaging chains or social media exchanges nearly always result in a futile argument?

I've been making a conscious effort to be a better person -- not that I was a bad person previously. Perhaps it's the influence of Ethical Culture, as I've been attending meetings more frequently of late. As noted above, none of us are perfect, and there's always room for improvement. I believe that one is never too old to be open to new ideas and adjust one's attitude and behavior as warranted. 

I've come to realize that analyzing the faults of others is actually a useful exercise, and does not have to generate negativity. Even the act of writing this blogpost has inspired me to look inward, as well as outward. I will continue to examine, adjust, tolerate and reflect on the imperfections in both myself and others. As discussed in my previous blogpost, to do good is my religion, and I will strive to help and inspire others, and to spread love, not discord. 

Peace out.

Seeking spirituality and finding my religion

There's a spectrum in spirituality -- from Atheist to Agnostic; from Deist to Theist. People define spirituality and religion in different ways. For many, a deity must be involved, and there are degrees of religiosity -- from casual acceptance of a general theology (e.g. identifying as "Christian" but without attachment to one of the three main branches) to steadfast adherence to a specific dogma or denomination. I've written a few posts here that touch on religion: "Death - the dreaded D word", " You never know what you might find in the Bible", and "Identity." If you read those you will likely get some insight into my beliefs (or lack thereof) on such concepts as god/God, science and the supernatural.

I am among those who believe that a deity is not required for someone to be spiritual or even religious. Sometimes in trying to explain my beliefs to others I get bogged down with semantics. How do we define spirituality? How do we define religion? My take on it (and it's my blog so that's what counts here) is that we can all decide the definition that feels right for each of us. I generally tell people who ask (and it comes up more often than you might think) that my religion is Unitarian Universalist Ethical Culturist. I am a member of two fellowships: The Unitarian Church of Staten Island and the New York Society for Ethical Culture. They do not contradict each other in any meaningful way, only in style and expression.

In casual conversation with people who don't know me very well, I sometimes just for brevity's sake say I'm agnostic or not religious. Many of my family members are devoutly attached to a specific theology (Fundamentalist Christianity for the majority of the folks on my father's side of the family, and a few Reform Jews on my mother's). Neither of my parents were "religious" in the colloquial meaning of the word, but that's a conversation for another blog post.

But if I channel the spirit of Thomas Paine, I can (somewhat) confidently say that I am indeed religious. I am also a spiritual person, even though I don't believe in the supernatural. Paine said, "...to do good is my religion" and that is the way I try to live my life. I have explored various religions and continue to debate with myself the existence of a god or gods. But with 60+ years of life experience, I've come to understand that I don't have to answer the age-old questions -- does God exist and if so what does He want from me -- to practice my two religions of Unitarian Universalism and Ethical Culture. Not all members of my community consider Ethical Culture a religion, but again, that's really just semantics. Call it what you want, but ultimately, what matters to me is not what you believe but what you do. Deed before creed.